Sunday, June 28, 2026

Are Christians Grafted In?


Well, some are.

And if some of the branches be broken, and thou, being a wild olive, art ingrafted in them, and art made partaker of the root, and of the fatness of the olive tree Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee Thou wilt say then: The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in Well: because of unbelief they were broken off. But thou standest by faith: be not highminded, but fear
[Romans 11:17-20]


It also says, some of the natural branches are broken.

Which ones?

The ones that rejected Jesus Christ.

What is a natural branch that is still on the root? A Christian of Jewish origin.

What is an ingrafted branch, first grown on a wild olive? A Christian of Non-Jewish origin.

What is a broken branch? A non-Christian Jew, which is what the word Jew most usually means in some languages.

Meanwhile, there is a real replacement, from Aaronic to Apostolic priesthood. Melchisedec was not called a Cohen because he was a secular official, he was a priest of the Most High. The wine and bread were not a diplomatic meal, but his sacrifice. And that means, there is today a non-rejected sacrifice, but one which is not of the Jewish rite, as the word is usually understood, but of the Catholic rite.

That replacement is very real.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts Peter and Paul
(after first vespers)
28—29.VI.2026

Romae natalis sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, qui eodem anno eodemque die passi sunt, sub Nerone Imperatore. Horum prior, in eadem Urbe, capite ad terram verso cruci affixus, et in Vaticano juxta viam Triumphalem sepultus, totius Orbis veneratione celebratur; posterior autem, gladio animadversus, et via Ostiensi sepultus, pari honore habetur.

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Vous connaissez Madame Brionne ?


À la mort de Charles de Lorraine, en 1751, la charge de grand écuyer avait été dévolue, selon le vœux du prince, à son petit-neveu, le comte de Brionne. Celui-ci avait alors quarante ans. Trois années auparavant, il avait épousé Louise-Julie-Constance de Rohan, de cette famille qui s'enorgueillissait d'être plus ancienne et plus noble que la ligne royale emme-même.

Si le comte de Brionne était bel homme, la fiancée était ravissante. Toute jeunette encore (elle n'avait pas quinze ans), elle annonçait déjà, dans les traits de son visage ou les formes graciles de son corps, une beauté que tous les courtisans se plurent à louer.


Laissons un peu Jacques Levron* pour voir si la wikipedia est plus précise. A-t-elle été 14 quand il avait 37 ou quand il avait 40 ?

Louise-Julie-Constance de Rohan-Rochefort, comtesse de Brionne, née le 5 mars 1734, reçue chanoinesse du couvent de Remiremont le 10 décembre 1742, épousa le 3 octobre 1748 à Paris Louis-Charles de Lorraine, comte de Brionne, veuf sans enfants de Louise-Charlotte de Gramont (1725-1742) et d'Augustine de Coëtquen (1722-1746).

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise-Julie-Constance_de_Brionne


Ah, elle a donc 14 et demi à l'époque de son mariage.**

Bon, avant la Révolution, elle va être grand écuyer après son mari, quand il meurt le 28 juin 1761, et elle a alors 27 ans, ou peu après.

Après la Révolution, ce que ne raconte pas Jacques Levron, elle aura le bonheur de faire l'exile inévitable à Presbourg, son fils finira le sien à Vienne./HGL

* Les inconnus de Versailles, Perrin, 1968. ** Par contre les wikipédiens contredisent sur l'âge du marié, qui, ce jour de ses troisièmes noces a 23 ans. Son premier mariage, il avait 14, comme la femme de ses troisièmes noces.

Sunday, June 14, 2026

Meaning of the name Shiluva


I saw a cite with clearly AI or guess work answers.

Šiluva is a place in Lithuania. Now, English doesn't have Š on the keyboard, so girls named for it are spelled Shiluva in the US.

Now, why would a girl be named after a place? Well, what about Lourdes? Or Christian girls named Fatima ?

Exactly, Šiluva is also a place with a Marian apparition, but I think it's pronounced on the first* syllable, Sean Hiller pronounces it on the second last (also second) syllable:

The Forgotten Marian Apparition That Shook the Reformation
Sean Hiller | 11 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gT3CUIy3Gs


* I was wrong, so was Hiller, it's actually last syllable:

Welcome to Šiluva!
Šiluvos šventovė | 25 March 2019
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ULYNyEustY

C'est pas les Musulmans qui se prosternent la face à terre ?


Pas que.

Les prêtres le jour de l'ordination le font aussi, en se préparant./HGL

Found Some on Nachmanides' Debate


Nachmanides’ strange understandings of demons, hell, souls, women’s period, rape, and other subjects
https://booksnthoughts.com/nachmanides-strange-understandings-of-demons-hell-souls-womens-period-rape-and-other-subjects/


Here are two things:

Nachmanides insisted that the midrashic tales are true accounts of past events. His commentaries to Genesis 11:28 and 32 are excellent examples of his manner of thinking ...


and:

Interestingly, Nachmanides’ belief that midrashic legends are recollections of actual historical events brought him trouble in his old age and led to his need to escape from Spain and flee for Israel. In 1263, he was involved in a public religious debate with the apostate Jew, Pablo Christiani, in Barcelona before King James I concerning the validity of Judaism. Pablo contended that some of the midrashic stories that Nachmanides had insisted were true occurrences foreshadowed the birth and mission of Jesus.[4] Nachmanides sidestepped Pablo’s trap by disclaiming his belief in the truthfulness and the authority of midrashim, and said that they are only legends.[5]


So, the convert Christian Pablo Christiani was more literalist than Nachmanides could afford to remain, interesting ...

Is it because Judaism is an apostasy and leads to more apostasy, unless repented?/HGL

Saturday, June 13, 2026

Sosa und Hitler


Ich denke, Kirchbücher gabs schon.

Das „Reichserbhofgesetz“ und die NSDAP verlangten den Nachweis der „rein arischen“ Abstammung – auch für den Ehepartner – bis 1800, für Bewerber für die SS (ab Führer und/oder Führeranwärter) sogar bis 1750 zurück („großer Ariernachweis“).


Dies wäre theoretisch möglich gewesen. Wurde es aber ausgeführt?

1) Adolf Hitler (1889–1945)

2) Alois Hitler (1837–1903)
3) Klara Pölzl (1860–1907)
 
4) ?
5) Maria Anna „Mariana“ Schicklgruber (1796–1847)
6) Johann Baptist Pölzl (1828–1902)
7) Johanna Hiedler (1830–1906)
 4) Johann Georg Hiedler (1792–1857)
5) Maria Anna „Mariana“ Schicklgruber (1796–1847)
6) Johann Baptist Pölzl (1828–1902)
7) Johanna Hiedler (1830–1906)
 
8) ?
9) ?
10) Johannes Schicklgruber (1764–1847)
11) Theresia Pfeisinger (1769–1821)
12) Laurenz Pölzl (1788–1841)
13) Juliana Walli (1797–1831)
14) Johann Nepomuk Hiedler (1807–1888)
15) Eva Maria Decker (1792–1873)
 8) Martin Hiedler (1762–1829)
9) Anna Maria Goschl (1760–1854)
10) Johannes Schicklgruber (1764–1847)
11) Theresia Pfeisinger (1769–1821)
12) Laurenz Pölzl (1788–1841)
13) Juliana Walli (1797–1831)
14) Johann Nepomuk Hiedler (1807–1888)
15) Eva Maria Decker (1792–1873)
 
16) ?
17) ?
18) ?
19) ?
20) ?
21) ?
22) ?
23) ?
24) ?
25) ?
26) ?
27) ?
28) Martin Hiedler (1762–1829)
29) Anna Maria Goschl (1760–1854)
30) ?
31) ?
 16) Johann Hiedler (1725–1803)
17) Maria Anna Neugeschwandter (?)
18) ?
19) ?
20) ?
21) ?
22) ?
23) ?
24) ?
25) ?
26) ?
27) ?
28 = 8
29 = 9
30) ?
31) ?


Wenn Alois der Sohn Johann Georg Hiedlers war, geht die Ahnentafel nur in 16 und 17 hinter 1750 zurück. Wenn nicht, geht keine Linie überhaupt hinter 1750 zurück.

Was wurde verschwiegen? Ahnen die viel später als am achten Lebenstag getauft wurden? Oder Ahnen dessen Ehepaar heiratete als dia Braut under 15 Jahre alt war? Übrigens, ich sehe Lebensjahre aber keine Heiratsjahre oder Daten. Und für Maria Anna Neugeschwandter nicht einmal Lebensdaten. War sie so nahe an 1750, daß sie etwa 12—13 bei der Geburt Martins war? Jedenfalls, ich hätte für beide Sachen mich nicht geschämt. Ein Mann der lieber Künzler hätte bleiben sollen, vielleicht schon.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
der hl. Anton von Padua
13.VI.2026

Patavii sancti Antonii Lusitani, Sacerdotis ex Ordine Minorum et Confessoris, atque Ecclesiae Doctoris, vita, et miraculis, ac praedicatione illustris, quem, uno post illius obitum anno nondum expleto, Gregorius Papa Nonus in Sanctorum canonem retulit.

PS, wenn Alois nicht der Sohn Johann Georg Hiedlers war geht die Ahnentafel freilich schon hinter 1750 zurück, aber nur in den 32 Ahnen: 32 bis 55 unbekannt, 56 Johann Hiedler (1725–1803) und 57 Maria Anna Neugeschwandter (?), dann 58 bis 63 wieder unbekannt. Wenn er es war, dann sind in den 32 Ahnen 56 = 16 und 57 = 17./HGL

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Fort Mc Henry and Moscow, What's the Connection?


Castelnuovo (Bosnia) and Lexington (Massachusetts) · Fort Mc Henry and Moscow, What's the Connection?

They were respectively defended against the English and against Napoleon Bonaparte.

And they were so around 14th of September, Feast of the Holy Cross, two years apart.

The fire of Moscow was a catastrophic urban fire that destroyed almost all of Moscow in September 1812 during the French occupation of the city following the French invasion of Russia. The Russian troops and most of the remaining civilians had abandoned the city on 14 September 1812 just ahead of French Emperor Napoleon's troops entering the city after the Battle of Borodino.


And:

"The Star-Spangled Banner" is the national anthem of the United States. The lyrics come from the "Defence of Fort M'Henry",[2] a poem written by American lawyer Francis Scott Key on September 14, 1814, after he witnessed the bombardment of Fort McHenry by the British Royal Navy during the Battle of Baltimore in the War of 1812. Key was inspired by the large U.S. flag, with 15 stars and 15 stripes, known as the Star-Spangled Banner, flying triumphantly above the fort after the battle.


I never knew this story until one young woman, hired to sing it in English, sang "El pendón estrellado" in Spanish. Then I looked it up. On youtube.

Now, defending Fort McHenry and defending Moscow, if at all, was two very different operations. Here is Moscow, and, as mentioned, the Russians left, but what happened next is disputed:

There is disagreement among historians over the cause of the fire. One theory holds that the fire was deliberately ordered or organized by Russian authorities, particularly Governor-General Fyodor Rostopchin, as part of a scorched-earth strategy intended to deny the occupying French army shelter and supplies.


This man was father of the children's author Countess de Ségur and grandfather of the Catholic clergyman Louis-Gaston de Ségur.

Here is Fort McHenry:

The Battle of Baltimore took place between British and American forces on September 12–14, 1814, during the War of 1812. Defending American forces repulsed sea and land invasions off the busy major port city of Baltimore, Maryland, by British forces preventing the United States' third largest city at the time from falling to British forces and ending the British Chesapeake campaign.

The British and Americans first met at the Battle of North Point.[10] Though the Americans were tactically defeated and forced to retreat, the battle was a successful delaying action that inflicted significant casualties on the British including the commanding general Robert Ross, halted their advance, and allowed the defenders at Baltimore to prepare for an attack.

The resistance of Baltimore's Fort McHenry during bombardment by the Royal Navy inspired Francis Scott Key to compose the poem "Defence of Fort M'Henry", which later became the lyrics for "The Star-Spangled Banner," the national anthem of the United States.

At Fort McHenry, some 1,000 soldiers under the command of Major George Armistead awaited the British naval bombardment. Their defense was augmented by the sinking of a line of American merchant ships at the adjacent entrance to Baltimore Harbor in order to further thwart the passage of British ships.

...

On the morning of September 14, the 30 ft × 42 ft (9.1 m × 12.8 m) oversized American flag, which had been made a year earlier by local flagmaker Mary Pickersgill and her 13-year-old daughter, was raised over Fort McHenry, replacing the tattered storm flag which had flown during battle. It was responded to by a small encampment of British riflemen on the right flank, who fired a round each at the sky and taunted the Americans just before they too returned to the shore line. Originally, historians said that the oversized Star Spangled Banner Flag was raised to taunt the British, but that is not the case. The oversized flag was used every morning for reveille, as was the case on the morning of September 14.


Taunt the British, it did, though. The description given elsewhere is, the flag (the storm-flag, not the oversized one) had been put back and back and back in place while Brits shot at those upholding it. Letting the flag sink would have been a sign, and that sign was not given. I'm reminded of a man who has used his blogs as a kind of flag, and who has been shot at, if not with bullets, at least with scorched earth tactics, false friendliness, denial of basic needs, like hygiene and sleep, by men who resent that blog. To whom they are what a red flag is to a bull.

It might taunt some Brits and Canadians that Mary Pickersgill's 13-year-old daughter didn't go to school but participated in sewing a flag. Just as it taunts some that Our Lady at 12 or 13 or 14 or sth was pregnant with Our Lord.

So, perhaps the connection is, Our Lord who Reigned from the Cross, didn't support fully Freemasons (a leopard head) against a Bear that had some piety, but did support their allies against a Lion that was losing its piety, quickly.

Just How Many Young-Earth Creationists Are There in the U.S.? says, c. 40 % of Americans are Young Earth Creationists. They are far fewer in the UK: After carrying out detailed face-to-face interviews with over a hundred Christians and Muslims, Unsworth designed her own survey. Of 2,116 people in Britain, she found that only 3% reject the idea that plants and animals have evolved from earlier life forms, whilst 6.8% reject the idea that humans have evolved from non-human life forms. Only 4% would qualify as young earth creationists.

Meanwhile, in France Young Earth Creationism is actively opposed, as per Antoine Bret: I became a Christian in France, without ever encountering young-earth creationism. I’d say that most Evangelicals in France (about half a million) feel uneasy about evolution, but not so much with the age of the universe. Faith and Science in France and Spain: An Interview with Antoine Bret Meanwhile, if Russians want schoolbooks that are Young Earth Creationist they don't need to resort to Harun Yahya, they have better stuff from inside. Or had, not sure how much Putin has since then discouraged it. Or Kirill.

There is also the difference that in France, Freemasons were recent usurpers of power. In the US, they were founding fathers. The only people in place to oppose England. The difference is a bit like the difference of Romulus worshipping Jupiter and of Julian the Apostate doing so. However, even in Russia, on Holy Cross day, the French were temporarily victorious, the Russian garrison withdrew from Moscow. Perhaps so that a certain Storopchyn could show Tatar cruelty in action.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
St. Margaret of Scotland
10.VI.2026

[16 Novembris] Edimburgi, in Scotia, natalis sanctae Margaritae Viduae, Scotorum Reginae, amore in pauperes et voluntaria paupertate celebris. Ipsius tamen festivitas quarto Idus Junii celebratur.
[10 Junii] Sanctae Margaritae Viduae, Scotorum Reginae, quae sextodecimo Kalendas Decembris obdormivit in Domino.