Wednesday, November 22, 2023

No, Churchill was not THAT guy


W 87  L 76  S 83  C 67  562
I 73  E 69  P 80  H 72  517
N 78  O 79  E 69  U 85  528
S 83  N 78  N 78  R 82  670
T 84  A 65  C 67  C 67
O 79  R 82  E 69  H 72
N 78  D 68  R 82  I 73
      L 76
      L 76
562  517  528  670  2277


What if we add spaces? 2277  2373  2849
Or lower case in given names? 0096  0576  0256
Or last name too? 2373  2849  3105


As I have previously stated, using ASCII for gematria is not likely to damn all and everyone just because you look at their name. I mean of course the name with the gematria mentioned in Apocalypse 13:18.

Even for those who have that gematria, that's not necessarily damning. On the other hand, if you find it in a politician or religious leader or big businessman, look out for whether what he's up to seems legit or not. There is one role, the Antichrist, perhaps two roles, the Antichrist and the False Prophet, who need this number in their gematria (I'm glad I don't have it!) and there are currently four people who have that gematria on the world scene, in ASCII:

  • Vladimir Putin has it in three gematrias ("WLADIMIRA", "VLADIMIRB", "V POUTINE")
  • Bergoglio in one (take that name and use only upper case letters)
  • a president of the US ("JRBIDENJR")
  • any male king of either England or Scotland after ASCII was invented ("ENGELSMAN", "skotte"; a ruling Queen would be an "ENGELSKA" or a "skotska" which also do not so add up).


What's up with "V POUTINE" and "VLADIMIRB"? Doesn't seem to mean anything?

"V. POUTINE" would be an initial and name of his in French. The dot or stop is in French called a point, so "V POUTINE" would incur that gematria by doing something point-less in a French speaking country.

"VLADIMIRB" would indeed mean nothing if you dissolve it as "Vladimirb". But what about "Vladimir B" = "Vladimir II"? Ah, we are talking. In his family-line he is the second known Vladimir (his father and grandfather are the only known ones before him, and only the father, not the grandfather, are named Vladimir). In all the history of Muscovy, even going back to Suzdal, he is the second ruler to be named Vladimir, the first one being Lenin. All Vladimirs in any Rus' before that, before the Russian Revolution, were in for instance Kyiv—and are more properly speaking referred to as Volodymyrs. Not in Suzdal or Vladimir-Suzdal (perhaps because they wanted to avoid being confused with their city) or in Moscow, or in Tver either. Nor any Czar. Only, first Lenin, now Putin./HGL

PS, 2849 is related to that number as a significant fraction, 77/18. Not sure that means anything./HGL

No comments: